Particularități ale axiomelor sociale: un studiu privind stabilitatea temporală realizat asupra unui grup de participanți români
Cuvinte cheie:
stabilitatea temporală a axiomelor sociale, trebuințe psihologice de bază, starea subiectivă de bineRezumat
This study investigates the stability of social axioms in time for a group of Romanians living in Romania. A sample of N = 501 participants, females and males aged 12 to 94 (M = 43.58, SD = 15.243), filled in an online survey between 22 May 2019 and 13 February 2021. A subgroup of n = 51 participants (about 10% of N) aged 17 to 94 years (M = 51.35, SD = 14.055), 29 females (M = 49.72, SD = 11.774) and 22 males (M = 53.50, SD = 16.644), college graduates in their vast majority, answered the questionnaire for three times: the first time in 2019 (precisely, between 22 May and 23 October 2019), the second time in 2020 (exactly, between 19 May and 19 November 2020), and the third time between 20 November 2020 and 13 February 2021. In this study, we used the Social Axioms Survey II (Leung et al., 2012), which measured social cynicism, reward for application, social complexity, fate control and religiosity; the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale – General Measure (Chen et al., 2015), which measured the basic psychological needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence; the five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, WHO-5 (1998), which measured the subjective well-being. ANOVA with repeated measures was used to understand whether there is a difference in social axioms amongst the 51 participants over the three investigation periods. The dependent variable was the social axiom, whilst the independent variable was time. IBM SPSS Statistics 24 was used. The repeated measures analysis of variance results indicating no statistically significant difference in social axioms amongst participants. However, significant differences between social axioms resulted between female and male participants. The present study contributes to a better understanding of social axioms and their relevance in relation to basic psychological needs and human behaviour.
Referințe
BERNARDO, A.B.I., Exploring the links between social axioms and the epistemological beliefs about learning held by Filipino students, în LEUNG, K. și BOND M. H. (Coord.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems, New York, Springer, 2009, p. 163–176.
BOND, M.H. et al., Culture-level Dimensions of Social Axioms and their Correlates Across 41 Cultures, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 5, 2004, p. 548−570.
BOND, M.H., On fluctuations in time of social axioms. Comunicare personală cu ocazia celui de al 25-lea Congres internațional al International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP), 26–31 iulie 2021, online.
CHEN, B. et al., Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 2, 2015, p. 216–236; ResearchCentral, Scala de Satisfacere și Frustrare a Trebuințelor Psihologice de Bază – Măsură generală, traducere de Mosoia, C., 2019, http://researchcentral.ro/index.php?action=listateste&ID=512.
COMUNIAN, A.L., Social axioms în Italian culture: Relationship with locus of control and moral development, în LEUNG, K. și BOND, M. H (Coord.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems, New York, Springer, 2009, p. 269–282.
DECI, E.L., & RYAN, R.M., The Importance of Universal Psychological Needs for Understanding Motivation în the Workplace, în GAGNÉ M. (Coord.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 16.
DECI, E.L., & RYAN, R.M., The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, 2000, p. 227–268.
DECI, E.L., & RYAN, R.M., Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination în Human Behavior, New York, Springer Science-Business Media, 1985, p. 43−175.
DECI, E.L., & VANSTEENKISTE, M., Self-Determination Theory and Basic Need Satisfaction: Understanding Human Development în Positive Psychology, Milano, Ricerche di Psicologia, 27, 1, 2004, p. 23−40.
DIENER, E., OISHI, S., LUCAS, R.E., Personality, culture and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life, în The Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 2003, p. 403−415.
DIENER, E., SELIGMAN, M.E.P., Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being, Psychological Science în the Public Interest, 5, 2004, p. 1–31.
DIENER, E., LUCAS, R.E., OISHI, S., Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction, în SNYDER C. R., LOPEZ S. J. (Coord.), Handbook of positive psychology, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 63.
DIENER, E., NICKERSON, C., LUCAS, R.E., SANDVIK, E., Dispositional affect and job outcomes, Social Indicators Research, 59, 2002, p. 229–259.
DIENER, E., & SELIGMAN, M.E.P., Very happy people, Psychological Science, 13, 2002, p. 81–84.
DIENER, E., SUH, E.M., Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis, în SCHAIE K.W., LAWTON M.P. (Coord.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, New York, Springer, 1998.
DIENER, E., SUH, E.M., SMITH, H., SHAO, L., National differences în reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur?, Social Indicators Research Special Issue: Global Report on Student Well-Being, 34, 1995, p. 7–32.
DIENER, E., DIENER, M., & DIENER, C., Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1995, p. 851–864.
DINCĂ, M., ILIESCU, D., Linking axioms with behavioral indicators and personality în Romania, în LEUNG, K., BOND M.H. (Coord.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems, New York, Springer, 2009, p. 145–162.
ILIESCU, D., DINCĂ, M., BOND, M.H., The Increment of Social Axioms over Broad Personality Traits în the Prediction of Dyadic Adjustment: An Investigation Across Four Ethnic Groups, European Journal of Personality, 31, 2017, p. 630–641.
ILIESCU, D., SULEA, C., Tratat de psihodiagnostic al personalității, Iași, Polirom, 2015, p. 146.
LAI, H.-W. J., BOND, M.H., & HUI, N. H.-H., The Role of Social Axioms in Predicting Life Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study in Hong Kong, Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 2007, p. 517–535.
LEUNG, K., BOND, M.H., Psychological aspects of social axioms. Understanding global belief systems, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009, p. 2.
LEUNG, K., BOND, M.H., Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions, în VIJVER F.V., HEMERT D.V., POORTINGA Y.P. (Coord.), Individuals and cultures în multilevel analysis, Erlbaum, 2008, p. 197−219.
LEUNG, K., BOND, M.H., Social Axioms: A Model for Social Beliefs în Multi-cultural Perspective, în ZANNA M.P. (Coord.), Advances în Experimental Social Psychology, San Diego, California, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, p. 119−197.
LEUNG, K., IP, O.K., & LEUNG, K.-K., Social Cynicism and Job Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Analysis, Applied psychology, 59, 2, 2010, 318–338.
LEUNG, K. et al., Social Axioms: The Search for Universal Dimensions of General Beliefs about How the World Functions, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 2002, p. 286−302.
LEUNG, K. et al., Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey în Eleven Countries: Its Relationship With the Five-Factor Model of Personality, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 5, 2012, p. 833–857.
LI, F., & LEUNG, K., Effects of Evaluation of Societal Conditions and Work-Family Conflict on Social Cynicism and Distress: A Longitudinal Analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 3, 2012, 717–734.
LEUNG, K., LI, F., ZHOU, F., Sex Differences in Social Cynicism Across Societies: The Role of Men’s Higher Competitiveness and Male Dominance, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 7, 2012, p. 1152–1166.
LIȚĂ, Ș., Evaluarea schimbării în intervenţiile psihologice - utilizarea scalei OMS-5 privind bunăstarea psihologică, a XI-a ediție a Simpozionului Naţional de Psihologie al Poliţiei Române−PSIMPOL „Psihologul – consilier în domeniul factorului uman în organizație”, București, 17–18 octombrie 2018.
LUCAS, R.E., CLARK, A.E., GEORGELLIS, Y., DIENER, E., Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes în marital status, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 3, 2003, p. 527–539.
MICHALOS, A.C. (Coord.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Dordrecht, Springer Science-Business Media, 2014, p. 6438−6439.
PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH UNIT, WHO COLLABORATING CENTRE IN MENTAL HEALTH, Chestionarul OMS al celor 5 criterii de apreciere a stării de bine (versiunea 1998), Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Danemarca. Citit de la https://www.psykiatri-regionh.dk/who-5/Documents/WHO5_Romanian.pdf
RYAN, R.M., DECI, E.L., Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being, American Psychologist, 55, 1, 2000, p. 68−78.
STANKOV, L., SAUCIER, G., Social Axioms in 33 Countries: Good Replicability at the Individual But Less So at the Country Level, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 2, 2015, p. 296–315.
TOPP, C.W., ØSTERGAARD, S.D., SØNDERGAARD, S., BECH, P., The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 2015, p. 167–176.
VOICU, V., POPESCU, I. (coordonatori), Pandemia COVID-19 în România. Aspecte patogenice, clinice și farmacoterapeutice, București, Editura Academiei Române, 2021, p. 13.
ZHOU, F., LEUNG, K., BOND, M. H., Social axioms and achievement across cultures: The influence of reward for application and fate control, Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 2009, p. 366−371.
